Quote:
Originally Posted by Hamossad
Recently I made a post I'm buying enroll, or for cashing it out it'll be on %
Now it's very fair to pay non-refundable money into escrow if purpose is just to buy off the enroll from seller.
But if you give more thinking into the situation where the seller wants it cashed out for a % cut, a logical person will conclude thereafter that money in escrow should be refundable hence risk is shared since seller wants in on the proceeds, he should also want in on the loss.
Anybody in here that done fraud long enough ought to know there's nothing like being a world class professional carder, cos this right here is fraud and anything is bound to occur when least expect, with all stores and payment processors updating fraud softwares round the clock.
So please admin look into this and think about it, even in legal partnership, profit is shared and loss is also shared. Same goes in crime.
One can't be greedy to partake in the cashout instead of just selling out, cos he knows the available amount on cc, and then he'll run and claim escrow when the shit hits the fan. THAT'S NOT BUSINESS!
My recommendation, if seller is not selling out and wanna share % profit, he should be ready to share loss too so far the working partner has absolute proof that nothing was cashed out. Online access is monitored to see if worker cashed out before job went south. And if not, money will be refunded cos the sleeping partner also wanted a cut of whatever that came and didn't sell out and looked the other way.
And before anybody argue professionalism, remember to ask why seller didn't just cash out his enroll, why bother partnering up and looking to transfer risk?
ADMIN PLEASE LOOK INTO THIS, I'm anybody's best bet in cashing out these enrolls but no way should anyone just relax and get a win win whether I succeed or not. If they wanna share my profit, they surely must share my loss or they sell out and leave me the risks 100%
I enroll cc myself, just that bin has been scarce lately.
PARTNERSHIP ESCROW MUST BE LOOKED INTO!
THANK YOU ADMIN
Update:
As it stands a fool that contacted me gave me -1 cos I argued he'll share loss too if he wants to share profit. Won't cashout themselves, won't sell out, their mind just reads pay in escrow and the rest is your business.
|
Thought and idea is very valid. But implementation is the hard part.
Its like when we can't take care of major variable, how can we approach the little variable.
major variable: partner authenticity
minor variable: his intent and intellect (many people use big words without actually even understanding the dictionary meaning of it)
But yes accountability have to be shifted to both the parties of the escrow. And that can be achieved by making it clear and have the other party also deposit escrow.
if one party does its part then it becomes the responsibility of the other party to come through with its promises.
Eg: paypal or any other transfer, if one party can prove he sent the funds, then if account gets blocked or funds get locked for no damn reason. the cashing party have to be in loss too, cause fuck up happened at their end.
NOTE: This can be misused in many ways eg. a DP source can sell the DP, which he knows have insuff funds and can pass the checker. But even if cashier is genuine, the cashier party gets fucked by source.
So it can be used to fuck both ways.
I guess that is why its hard to implement.
mention terms exactly in ESCROW and let each party take responsibility and agrre to it and
MOST IMPORTANT: prove conclusively that they have done their part without any reasonable doubt.
peace