Let’s clear something up.
We know the Jabber name could’ve been public — that’s not the point. The point is, **nobody else knew** about our private conversation with support2crd. We were the **first ones** to reach out to them about your case, and we **offered $200** in good faith to resolve it. That conversation was between **only us and support2crd**.
Now, here's where it gets suspicious: before we were even unbanned, **you** reached out to us via Jabber. How would you know what was said in a private convo between us and 2crd unless **you were the same person** or connected somehow?
To make it worse, you’re now claiming that wasn’t you — but your writing style is **identical** to the messages we received on Jabber. Same tone. Same way of talking. And again, **only support2crd and Mak** knew about the $200 offer — so how did you find out about it?
You expect us to believe this is all just coincidence? That some random person used your name, wrote exactly like you, and magically knew about a private conversation that only two people were part of?
No. That’s not how this works.
This looks shady as hell, and I’ve already asked Mak to investigate if you ever used that Jabber or a MacBook Pro to access the forum.
We’re asking the moderators to look closely at this pattern — your contradictions, the timing, and your tone. You’re trying to rewrite the narrative now that it’s not convenient for you. That’s not transparency — that’s manipulation.
Добавлено через 15 секунд
Let’s clear something up.
We know the Jabber name could’ve been public — that’s not the point. The point is, **nobody else knew** about our private conversation with support2crd. We were the **first ones** to reach out to them about your case, and we **offered $200** in good faith to resolve it. That conversation was between **only us and support2crd**.
Now, here's where it gets suspicious: before we were even unbanned, **you** reached out to us via Jabber. How would you know what was said in a private convo between us and 2crd unless **you were the same person** or connected somehow?
To make it worse, you’re now claiming that wasn’t you — but your writing style is **identical** to the messages we received on Jabber. Same tone. Same way of talking. And again, **only support2crd and Mak** knew about the $200 offer — so how did you find out about it?
You expect us to believe this is all just coincidence? That some random person used your name, wrote exactly like you, and magically knew about a private conversation that only two people were part of?
No. That’s not how this works.
This looks shady as hell, and I’ve already asked Mak to investigate if you ever used that Jabber or a MacBook Pro to access the forum.
We’re asking the moderators to look closely at this pattern — your contradictions, the timing, and your tone. You’re trying to rewrite the narrative now that it’s not convenient for you. That’s not transparency — that’s manipulation.