![]() |
I'm not reg in pedo forums sorry rat |
Quote:
</br> |
Да не важно, в принципе, что он продал. Может быть кому то решение это понравится. Давай те не будем выходить за рамки нормального общения, потому что тему действительно можно обсудить, если автор готов дать развернутые ответы. |
Quote:
No need to bash service or made threats we offered answers to questions. </br></br> |
Quote:
1. Вы можете реализовать то же самое под Samsung Pay? Было бы намного интереснее. 2. Что значит отключить чип? Вы изменяете сервис код с 201 на 101? Такая транзация быстрее всего будет отклонена банков из за неверного CCV (для MasterCard и Visa). 3. Видео - chase - это видео то же 2015 года. Но из видео я не могу сказать что оплата была именно этой картой ) Очень похоже на постановочную сценку! 4. И даже если так - то можно и на магнитной полосе изменить 201 на 101 и это действительно, может сработать, но как говорит практика, это 1 дамп из 1000 , тем более на подлимитные транзы. Добавлено через 9 минут 5 секунд Потому что, мы все здесь, картопизделы) </br></br></br></br></br> |
Quote:
1. Can you do the same for Samsung Pay? It would be much more interesting. A. Working on apple pay and samsung pay not available yet. 2. What does it mean to turn off the chip? Do you change the service code from 201 to 101? Such a transaction will most quickly be rejected by banks due to incorrect CCV (for MasterCard and Visa). A. service code stored on mag and yes is possible to change code or bypass this remove of service code to turn off chip+pin allow you to push data to terminal when card would ask for card to be dipped not asking for dip card bypass allowing for swipe only as service bits have been changed. There service code is most where you will find the interesting stuff. for example First digits 1. International interchange OK 2. Internationa interchange, US IC (CHIP) where feasible 5. National interchage only under bilaterla agreement 6 National interchange only except under bilateral agreemen, (Use IC chip) where feasible 7 No interchange except under bilateral agreement (closed loops) Second Digits 0. Normal 2. Contact Issuer Via Online Means 4. Contact Issuer Via Online Means (except under bilateral agreement) Third Digit 0. No restrictions (PIN REQUIRED) 1. No restrictions 2. Goods and Services only (NO CASH) 3. ATM Onlin ( PIN REQUIRED) 4. Cash Only 5. Goods and services only (NO CASH) PIN REQUIRED 6. No restrictions (Use Pin Where Feasible) 7 Goods and services (No Cash) Use PIN where feasible What mag spoof can do is disable the bits that show the card is Chip+PIN this allows you to use without need to "DIP" card for 2nd auth as the bits that show the card is C+P are disabled. Interesting is the Track 2 with 5-bit ( 4 data bits and + 1 parity with allow for 16 possible chars num 0-9 and six chars ;:<=>? Start Sentinel PAN Separator EXP Date Service Code - three digit first digit specifies interchange rule set 2nd is auth processing and third is range of service.. Discretionary data ( as in T1) End Sentinel LRC check ;CARDNUMBER=YYMM SSSS DISCRETIONARY?LCR A. Agree video is not best and will update videos soon to show better working of device. A. this is not for us to test but has been working valid on many cards without issue or report in |
so to bypass 201 you put in 101................................. stop like Vadim say only 1 on 10 000 card would work if it work so at the end the value of your tool is not deserve it so nothing special from your tool and video of 2015 mean nothing in 2019 you not a scammer but again claiming something big who in fact is low that not deserve 2.5 btc i put you a + but at the end is like same level as non working atm malware this shit is old and dont work on all it work on certain bins but have to found them and after used of 10 card bin get stop is too much work for the cost and it can be done for lower amount but the bypass of the emv chip is horrible my friend, thats just what i want to say |
Asked to design new NFC style device with possible for Both Mag+NFC+ NFCProxy capability. (Design in works) Testing new code for both offline reset PIN try count values PTC max value exceed (Offline Mode Current) Code: <pre class="alt2" dir="ltr" style=" margin: 0px; padding: 6px; border: 1px solid rgb(0, 0, 0); width: 640px; height: 322px; text-align: left; overflow: auto; background: rgb(37, 37, 37) none repeat scroll 0% 0%; border-radius: 5px; font-size: 11px; text-shadow: none;">update_pin_try_counter(tries): #Reset Card Status Update if tries > 0x0f: return False, 'PTC Attempt MAX csu= [] csu.append(tries) csu.append(0x10) csu.append(0x00) csu.append(0x00) tag= 0x91 # Issuer Authentication Data (IAD) lc= len(csu) + 1 def generate_ac(type): # generate an application Cryptogram if type == TC: # populate data with CDOL1 apdu= GENERATE_AC + [lc,type] + data + [le] le= 0x00</pre> Question... for the decode of the aip data the first byte of AIP is bit masked where as byte 2 is of RFU so for this would be as for x in AIP_MASK.keys(); if data [0] & x: print ' ' + AIP_MASK[x} After this point decode the afl data and print to hex? |
|
I will raise your topic https://txgate.io/images/smilies/trollface.png - make a modification with a wireless track loading and take a coil from the wireless charging - it will be a presentation look. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 01:03 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.